Feat/619/credential request improvements m

oyo commented 1 month ago

Description

Please include a summary of the change.

Why

Please include an explanation of why this change is necessary as well as relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Issue

Link to Github issue.

Checklist

Please delete options that are not relevant.

[ ] I have followed the contributing guidelines
[ ] I have performed IP checks for added or updated 3rd party libraries
[ ] I have created and linked IP issues or requested their creation by a committer
[ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
[ ] I have successfully tested my changes locally
[ ] I have added tests that prove my changes work
[ ] I have checked that new and existing tests pass locally with my changes
[ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas

github-actions[bot] commented 1 month ago

Hey there and thank you for opening this pull request! 👋🏼

We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.

Details:

No release type found in pull request title "Feat/619/credential request improvements m". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/

Available types:
 - feat: A new feature
 - fix: A bug fix
 - docs: Documentation only changes
 - style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
 - refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
 - perf: A code change that improves performance
 - test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
 - build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
 - ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
 - chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
 - revert: Reverts a previous commit

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

eclipse-tractusx / portal-frontend