search

eclipse-tractusx / sig-infra

Apache License 2.0
2 stars 2 forks source link

Please archive obsolete Catena-X repositories 'product-agents' and 'product-agents-edc' #256

Closed drcgjung closed 12 months ago

drcgjung commented 1 year ago

Is your support request related to a problem? Please describe.

Someone could be tempted to develop things against these outdated repos

(they have been contributed to their new home eclipse-tractusx/knowledge-agents and eclipse-tractusx/knowledge-agents-edc and forked for collaboration into catenax-ng/tx-knowledge-agents and catenax-ng/tx-knowledge-agents-edc in the meantime).

Describe the solution you'd like

the two outdated repos should be archived (such that the artifacts could still be downloaded in beta environments that have not yet been migrated to the 23.09 release)

Later (after the 23.12 release), the two repos can be deleted.

Additional context

To be archived/deleted

New official homes are

Collaboration/preparation forks are

hzierer commented 1 year ago

Hi @drcgjung ,

shall we update the "about" sections accordingly with a link to the replacement/equivalent? If so, can you provide a list to the successors / best matches?

drcgjung commented 1 year ago

that's a nice hint.

I already did that (at least verbose and pointing to the tx-forks, not as a hyperlink to eclipse-tractusx ... if that would be possible, I would appreciate that)

Would it be possible to update the eclipse-tractusx repos About sections too?

knowledge-agents -> 'Reference Implementations of CX-0084'

knowledge-agents-edc -> 'EDC Extensions for CX-0084'

hzierer commented 1 year ago

yes, the tool of the EF also supports changing the description and hyperlinks are also no problem in there.

But I think we should avoid a simple notion of an internal name ("CX-0084") on a public repo - is this specification somewhere publicly available or maybe under another name?

hzierer commented 1 year ago

And just to be sure: catenax-ng/product-agents "refers" to catenax-ng/tx-knowledge-agents, which is a fork of eclipse-tractusx/knowledge-agents. And after this tickets all 3 (6 with the -edc ones) should be archived (and ultimately deleted). So the whole code is lost after the 23.12 release? Is that the intention?

drcgjung commented 1 year ago

yes, the tool of the EF also supports changing the description and hyperlinks are also no problem in there.

But I think we should avoid a simple notion of an internal name ("CX-0084") on a public repo - is this specification somewhere publicly available or maybe under another name?

Fair enough, I think the standard will be published with the 23.09 Release under a hyperlink something like that: https://catena-x.net/fileadmin/user_upload/Standard-Bibliothek/Archiv/Update_September_23_R_3.2/CX-0084-FederatedQueriesInDataSpaces-v1.0.0.pdf

Until the release wave is published, it could be found here

CX-0084-FederatedQueriesInDataSpaces-v1.0.0.pdf

You could refer to it more complete as 'CX-0084 Federated Queries In Data Spaces'

drcgjung commented 1 year ago

And just to be sure: catenax-ng/product-agents "refers" to catenax-ng/tx-knowledge-agents, which is a fork of eclipse-tractusx/knowledge-agents. And after this tickets all 3 (6 with the -edc ones) should be archived (and ultimately deleted). So the whole code is lost after the 23.12 release? Is that the intention?

God, no. The intention is just to deprecate/archive the catenax-ng/product-agents and catenax-ng/product-agents-edc repositories.

The eclipse-tractusx and their forks will stay forever ... at least will be maintained for 23.12

hzierer commented 1 year ago

ok, thank you for the clarification

hzierer commented 12 months ago

Hi @drcgjung,

all changes have been applied. Can you please check.

drcgjung commented 12 months ago

I would have one last plea ... I know that this was not part of the original description.

The associated maven packages

would need to be deleted too (else we cannot publish them under the tx- repos, that is a "bug" in github)

Thx much!

almadigabor commented 12 months ago

Hey @drcgjung! Deleted all the requested packages. Please confirm. Also let me know if all the tasks are done and this issue can be closed. Thanks!

drcgjung commented 12 months ago

@almadigabor you are the best!!!!