eclipse-tractusx / sig-release

https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/sig-release
Apache License 2.0
8 stars 8 forks source link

docs: update product release issue template #813

Open ther3sa opened 2 months ago

ther3sa commented 2 months ago

Removed checks for interoperability, data sovereignty and threat modeling because of changes in the process

Pre-review checks

Please ensure to do as many of the following checks as possible, before asking for committer review:

matbmoser commented 2 months ago

Shall we add the #Feature section?

Examples:

ther3sa commented 2 months ago

Looks good!

just one thing, it might make sense to wait for eclipse-tractusx/eclipse-tractusx.github.io#865 to be merged to remove also the Styleguide point, which is also moved to a TRG

And just one small hint: the pull request title is very long, would maybe make sense to summerize to into something like docs: update product release issue template

Hey Evelyn, what do you mean by Styleguide point? :)

matbmoser commented 2 months ago

@ther3sa there is a new TRG about styleguide: https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/docs/release/trg-9/trg-9-01

Honestly, I would keep it out of the v24.08, and maybe ensure that is compliant in the v24.12.

evegufy commented 2 months ago

Looks good! just one thing, it might make sense to wait for eclipse-tractusx/eclipse-tractusx.github.io#865 to be merged to remove also the Styleguide point, which is also moved to a TRG And just one small hint: the pull request title is very long, would maybe make sense to summerize to into something like docs: update product release issue template

Hey Evelyn, what do you mean by Styleguide point? :)

I think I was confusing it with the point User Journey, I suggest to either remove it or define who should check that in the future, as the role of the PO doesn't exist anymore

evegufy commented 1 month ago

Looks good! just one thing, it might make sense to wait for eclipse-tractusx/eclipse-tractusx.github.io#865 to be merged to remove also the Styleguide point, which is also moved to a TRG And just one small hint: the pull request title is very long, would maybe make sense to summerize to into something like docs: update product release issue template

Hey Evelyn, what do you mean by Styleguide point? :)

I think I was confusing it with the point User Journey, I suggest to either remove it or define who should check that in the future, as the role of the PO doesn't exist anymore

@ther3sa could you please provide feedback about the removal of the User Journey or if it's not planned to remove it, who is supposed to check that?

ther3sa commented 1 month ago

Looks good! just one thing, it might make sense to wait for eclipse-tractusx/eclipse-tractusx.github.io#865 to be merged to remove also the Styleguide point, which is also moved to a TRG And just one small hint: the pull request title is very long, would maybe make sense to summerize to into something like docs: update product release issue template

Hey Evelyn, what do you mean by Styleguide point? :)

I think I was confusing it with the point User Journey, I suggest to either remove it or define who should check that in the future, as the role of the PO doesn't exist anymore

@ther3sa could you please provide feedback about the removal of the User Journey or if it's not planned to remove it, who is supposed to check that?

I am currently in the process of clarifying how we will deal with the user journey in future. I will provide an update on this as soon as I have a result. :)

stephanbcbauer commented 1 month ago

@ds-hzimmer , @ds-tthies , @ther3sa as discussed ... @ther3sa and I adapted the content. Please have a look beforehand. Is something missing? If yes, please adapt.

We should check topics redundant. Some checks are already done via TRGs

matbmoser commented 1 week ago

@stephanbcbauer and @ther3sa Can we also add something like: Architecture Approval? Was not somthing that was mentioned in the last technical sync?

Do we also want to include dependencies? Like - Updated dependency graph?

ther3sa commented 2 days ago

@stephanbcbauer and @ther3sa Can we also add something like: Architecture Approval? Was not somthing that was mentioned in the last technical sync?

Do we also want to include dependencies? Like - Updated dependency graph?

Hi @matbmoser , the architecture approval will be addressed in the feature issue.

Could you please clarify what you mean by the dependency graph? I’m not entirely sure I understand your idea correctly.