This feature aims to introduce enhanced support for managing business partner relationships, including the lifecycle of business entities (predecessors and successors). The feature will allow businesses to track and maintain detailed relationship data between partner entities throughout their lifecycle changes, ensuring a comprehensive view of the evolving partnerships.
Explain the topic in 2 sentences
Enhance business partner management by adding features for tracking predecessor-successor relationships. The goal is to provide transparency in entity transitions and improve the efficiency of business partner management processes.
What's the benefit?
This feature will improve operational efficiency by providing clear insights into the business partner lifecycle and relationships. It reduces complexity and risk by enabling better alignment and communication across partners.
What are the Risks/Dependencies?
This feature introduces potential breaking changes in how business partner data is stored and managed.
It may require alignment with interface partners who depend on this data.
The architecture team will need to review the current system for compatibility.
Detailed explanation
Current implementation
Currently, the system tracks business partners as isolated entities with no built-in functionality to manage transitions like mergers, acquisitions, or restructuring.
Proposed improvements
Introduce fields and logic to track lifecycle changes, allowing the system to link predecessor and successor companies.
Improve data querying and reporting capabilities to provide a clear overview of business partner relationships over time.
Feature Team
Contributor
Contributor 1
Contributor 2
Committer
Committer 1
Committer 2
User Stories
Issue 1: Implement tracking of business partner lifecycle, linked to the repository for business partner data.
Acceptance Criteria
[ ] Criteria 1: Business partners can be linked to predecessor and successor entities.
[ ] Criteria 2: Data queries return relationship information accurately.
Test Cases
Test Case 1
Steps
Add a new business partner.
Create a lifecycle event linking predecessor and successor.
Query for business partner relationship data.
Expected Result
Business partner is stored.
Lifecycle event correctly links predecessor and successor.
Relationship data is accurately returned in queries.
Architectural Relevance
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented:
[ ] This feature aligns with our current architectural guidelines
Justification:(Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
[ ] I am aware that my request may not be developed if no developer can be found for it. I'll try to contribute a developer (bring your own developer)
@HeyHardy since I would like to keep these issues here as clear product features I would like to rename this issue to "Business Partner Successor and Predecessor Relationships"
Overview
related feature Enhancement Concept and Standardization of BP Predecessor/Successor
This feature aims to introduce enhanced support for managing business partner relationships, including the lifecycle of business entities (predecessors and successors). The feature will allow businesses to track and maintain detailed relationship data between partner entities throughout their lifecycle changes, ensuring a comprehensive view of the evolving partnerships.
Explain the topic in 2 sentences
Enhance business partner management by adding features for tracking predecessor-successor relationships. The goal is to provide transparency in entity transitions and improve the efficiency of business partner management processes.
What's the benefit?
This feature will improve operational efficiency by providing clear insights into the business partner lifecycle and relationships. It reduces complexity and risk by enabling better alignment and communication across partners.
What are the Risks/Dependencies?
Detailed explanation
Current implementation
Currently, the system tracks business partners as isolated entities with no built-in functionality to manage transitions like mergers, acquisitions, or restructuring.
Proposed improvements
Feature Team
Contributor
Committer
User Stories
Acceptance Criteria
Test Cases
Test Case 1
Steps
Expected Result
Architectural Relevance
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented:
Justification: (Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information