[TRACE-X]🌟🚀 Investigate Database Performance and Identify Optimization Opportunities

[mkanal]

Overview

Explain the topic in 2 sentences

What's the benefit?

What are the Risks/Dependencies ?

• Nothing to report

Detailed explanation

Current implementation

Proposed improvements

Feature Team

Contributor

• Cofinity-X @rogocof
• Cofinity-X @mkanal

Committer

• @ds-jhartmann
• @ds-mwesener
• @ds-lcapellino

---

User Story

As a team, I want to analyze the current performance of the PostgreSQL database, so that I can identify potential areas for optimization and improve overall system performance and efficiency.

Background

• The database is experiencing performance issues, which are impacting application response times and user experience.
• There is a lack of detailed insights into the specific causes of performance bottlenecks.
• A comprehensive analysis of the database performance, including identification of slow queries, indexing issues, and resource utilization.
• A clear set of actionable recommendations for optimization to enhance database performance.

Acceptance Criteria

• [ ] Conduct a performance evaluation of the database, including but not limited to query performance, indexing strategies, and hardware resource utilization.
• [ ] Identify and document the performance bottlenecks, such as slow-running queries, inefficient indexes, or high resource consumption.
• [ ] Provide a list of optimization strategies, such as query rewriting, index optimization, database configuration adjustments.
• [ ] Create pbis for improvements and optimization tasks
• [ ] Execute and document a benchmark test after implementation in Confluence

---

Test Cases

Test Case 1

Steps

1. Do something
2. Click something
3. Add something

Expected Result

1. Expectation
2. Expectation
3. Expectation

Architectural Relevance

The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented:

• [ ] This feature aligns with our current architectural guidelines
  • Data Sovereignty: All data sharing activities across company boundaries follow the Catena-X Regulatory Framework, in particular the Data Exchange Governance, and the Dataspace Protocol via a compliant Connector (like the tractusx-edc or similar, see Connector KIT)
  • [ ] CX-0010 Business Partner Number
  • [ ] CX-0013 Identity of Member Companies
  • [ ] CX-0018 Data Space Connectivity (EDC)
  • [ ] CX-0049 DID Document Schema
  • [ ] CX-0050 Framework Agreement Credential
  • [ ] CX-0149 Verified Company Identity
  • Interoperability: Digital Twins are used (compliant to the Digital Twin KIT and the Industry Core KIT)
  • [ ] CX-0001 EDC Discovery API
  • [ ] CX-0002 Digital Twins in Catena-X
  • [ ] CX-0018 Data Space Connectivity (EDC)
  • Data Format:
  • [ ] The data model is based on a published Semantic Model
• [ ] The impact on the overall system architecture has been assessed. The Feature does not require changes to the architecture or any existing standard? Please have a look here on the overarching architecture
• [ ] Potential risks or conflicts with existing architecture has been assessed

Justification: (Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)

Additional information

• [x] I am aware that my request may not be developed if no developer can be found for it. I'll try to contribute a developer (bring your own developer)

[stephanbcbauer]

Some hints from Release Management (@ther3sa) and Tractus-X Project Lead (@stephanbcbauer)

• Status currently in Backlog -> Since for Backlog some requirements are missing ... please update them
• Please add missing sections from the feature template, or fill them out
• Please add assignee (overall responsible person who drives the feature)