Maintenance PCF KIT

[plangbehn]

Explain the topic in 2 sentences

A) PCF DatenModel: Include the payload keys in the PCF DataModel Details table and revise the technical names accordingly. https://eclipse-tractusx.github.io/docs-kits/kits/PCF%20Exchange%20Kit/Adoption%20View#introduction-pcf-data-model

B) EDC Policy: Revise the description of how bilateral contracts can be used

C) PCF Request: Review the description and revise it to eliminate misunderstandings and possibly also inconsistencies (e.g. with regard to synchronous/and or asynchronous operation, currently only asynchronous operation is possible, but the description looks like a synchronous retrieval of the PCF data)

What's the benefit?

A) Create a better understanding of the content.

B) To have an explicit use case for the contracts >> enablement of the users

C) Clear and concise description

What are the Risks/Dependencies ?

A) There are none.

B) Incorrect use of bilateral contracts.

C) Missing functionality.

Detailed explanation

Current implementation

Proposed improvements

Feature Team

Contributor

• Multiple contributers from expert group Architecture and Interoparbility

Committer

• @stephanbcbauer

User Stories

• New members who can not fully understand the content of the PCF Kit.

Acceptance Criteria

• A) Include payload description into semantic model
• B) Having an understandable explanation, revised by users.
• C) Having an understandable explanation, revised by users.

Architectural Relevance

The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented:

• [ ] This feature aligns with our current architectural guidelines
  • Data Sovereignty: All data sharing activities across company boundaries follow the Catena-X Regulatory Framework, in particular the Data Exchange Governance, and the Dataspace Protocol via a compliant Connector (like the tractusx-edc or similar, see Connector KIT)
  • [ ] CX-0010 Business Partner Number
  • [ ] CX-0013 Identity of Member Companies
  • [ ] CX-0018 Data Space Connectivity (EDC)
  • [ ] CX-0049 DID Document Schema
  • [ ] CX-0050 Framework Agreement Credential
  • [ ] CX-0149 Verified Company Identity
  • Interoperability: Digital Twins are used (compliant to the Digital Twin KIT and the Industry Core KIT)
  • [ ] CX-0001 EDC Discovery API
  • [ ] CX-0002 Digital Twins in Catena-X
  • [ ] CX-0018 Data Space Connectivity (EDC)
  • Data Format:
  • [ ] The data model is based on a published Semantic Model
• [x] The impact on the overall system architecture has been assessed. The Feature does not require changes to the architecture or any existing standard? Please have a look here on the overarching architecture
• [x] Potential risks or conflicts with existing architecture has been assessed

Justification: (Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)

Additional information

• [x] I am aware that my request may not be developed if no developer can be found for it. I'll try to contribute a developer (bring your own developer)

[stephanbcbauer]

Some hints from Release Management (@ther3sa) and Tractus-X Project Lead (@stephanbcbauer)

• Status currently in Inbox. ⇾ Only features with status backlog are considered in open planning
• Please add missing sections from the feature template, or fill them out
• Please add contributor and committer
• Please add assignee (overall responsible person who drives the feature)