search

eclipse-tractusx / sldt-semantic-models

sldt-semantic-models
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
26 stars 41 forks source link

[Model Issue]: bamm instead of samm in bom_as_specified #744

Open gautam-e opened 1 month ago

gautam-e commented 1 month ago

URL to Model with Issue

https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/sldt-semantic-models/blob/main/io.catenax.bom_as_specified/1.0.1/BomAsSpecified.ttl

Issue Description

The model above references only BAMM and not SAMM. If I understand correctly, BAMM has been renamed / replaces by SAMM. In that case, the model needs to be corrected.

agg3fe commented 1 month ago

@gautam-e Hi, Would be great if you or someone from your team can join the weekly meeting on Monday. We can then discuss this issue and provide necessary approval.

gautam-e commented 1 month ago

@agg3fe I'm not aware of the Monday meeting. I also don't work on Mondays. The request is fairly simple to understand though so I guess it could be done without me(?). Let me know if there's any other way I can help.

agg3fe commented 1 month ago

@agg3fe I'm not aware of the Monday meeting. I also don't work on Mondays. The request is fairly simple to understand though so I guess it could be done without me(?). Let me know if there's any other way I can help.

@gautam-e Ok, in that case please create the Pull Request for the new model in Samm and let me know when done. I will review and provide the feedback. But before the final approval, someone from your team has to join the meeting as this is the governance process that we follow to add new models. This is required so that all the other catena-x members are also aware of new samm model.

gautam-e commented 1 month ago

@agg3fe done. Please have a look https://github.com/eclipse-tractusx/sldt-semantic-models/pull/760 It looks like I don't have the permission to do this though. But perhaps you can take over the PR or something.