Open PLeVasseur opened 3 months ago
Is this now solved by #72? Or do you have any additional ideas?
I think this x-compilation is purely for academical purposes at the moment - there is nothing in this crate where the target arch should make a difference.
@AnotherDaniel and me had a quick sync-up. He'd like to review the issue more and address this in a follow-up PR when #72 is merged to add cross-compilation.
... and while we're on it: Is x-compiling from x86_64 (I assume?) to aarch64 the only relevant scenario? Are there more?
... and while we're on it: Is x-compiling from x86_64 (I assume?)
You assume correctly!
only relevant scenario? Are there more?
If you wanted bonus points, I know in Automotive using QNX is pretty common (and on the roadmap for Ferrocene), so we could also try to get *-nto-qnx-*
working
Have to build the compiler from source and need a QNX fork of gcc called qcc to link tho... so maybe not in the open source, unless there's a way to get a QNX license for open source work. :slightly_smiling_face:
Tagging @stevenhartley for above point :point_up_2:
Uh... you know, that is something I'll leave up to the BB QNX guys to look into ;-)
For now - waiting to get these required-workflow-blockers out of the way, then I'll set up the x64-arm64 x-compile on ubuntu, to meet your needs there. The rest can follow later...
I got this working locally by:
then adding to
.cargo/config.toml
:then I could
Could we add this to the CI/CD pipeline?
Any thoughts from folks? Tagging in @AnotherDaniel, @sophokles73