Open rettichschnidi opened 3 years ago
SPDX in header sounds new to me, I guess I missed this requirement.
I'm not sure if we should use OR or AND but I think a OR is more appropriated as I understand that user should accept the term of one of the license. :thinking:
About EDL there is no SPDX Id and following this message of Wayne BSD-3-Clause
should be used.
So I understand it should be :
SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause
@waynebeaton could you confirm this ? :pray:
Confirmed.
Adapted the original issue. Do we already have a label to mark easy-issues?
I just created it.
The copyright headers in our repository do not contain Software Package Data Exchange (SPDX) identifiers, which is required by the Eclipse Foundation Project Handbook.
Acceptance Criteria
SPDX-License-Identifier: EPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause