search

eclipse / editdor

Eclipse ediTDor - A tool for simply designing W3C Thing Descriptions
https://eclipse.github.io/editdor/
38 stars 19 forks source link

Warning for missing forms in TMs #62

Closed egekorkan closed 2 years ago

egekorkan commented 2 years ago

For the TM below which does not have forms in the affordances, there is a warning saying they are missing. This is not following the standard.

https://eclipse.github.io/editdor/?td=%7B%22%40context%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2Fwot%2Ftd%2Fv1%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22ediTDor%20Thing%22%2C%22%40type%22%3A%22tm%3AThingModel%22%2C%22securityDefinitions%22%3A%7B%22nosec_sc%22%3A%7B%22scheme%22%3A%22nosec%22%7D%7D%2C%22security%22%3A%22nosec_sc%22%2C%22properties%22%3A%7B%22asd%22%3A%7B%22title%22%3A%22asd%22%2C%22observable%22%3Afalse%2C%22readOnly%22%3Afalse%7D%7D%2C%22actions%22%3A%7B%22dsf%22%3A%7B%22title%22%3A%22dsf%22%7D%7D%7D

BessemMnif commented 2 years ago

For the TM below which does not have forms in the affordances, there is a warning saying they are missing. This is not following the standard.

https://eclipse.github.io/editdor/?td=%7B%22%40context%22%3A%22https%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2019%2Fwot%2Ftd%2Fv1%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22ediTDor%20Thing%22%2C%22%40type%22%3A%22tm%3AThingModel%22%2C%22securityDefinitions%22%3A%7B%22nosec_sc%22%3A%7B%22scheme%22%3A%22nosec%22%7D%7D%2C%22security%22%3A%22nosec_sc%22%2C%22properties%22%3A%7B%22asd%22%3A%7B%22title%22%3A%22asd%22%2C%22observable%22%3Afalse%2C%22readOnly%22%3Afalse%7D%7D%2C%22actions%22%3A%7B%22dsf%22%3A%7B%22title%22%3A%22dsf%22%7D%7D%7D

That`s rather true and even if the security field is deleted we get warnings or normally this should not be the case (Thing Model definitions will be also valid if there are no JSON members like forms, base, securityDefinitions, and security)