Closed DJDavies2 closed 2 months ago
Could you send this PR to ecmwf-ifs:develop instead of ecmwf-ifs:main?
Could you send this PR to ecmwf-ifs:develop instead of ecmwf-ifs:main?
I see this has been done?
Will it be possible to get this change merged?
I have no problem with it personally, but we need to check this is okay with our Météo-France colleagues as they introduced the CONTIGUOUS
statements. I'll try to get an answer from them.
Closing as #93 is closed.
This is for #93, it seems to fix the Intel issue.
I don't know if this is acceptable as it removes the CONTIGUOUS from a dummy argument. I think this is a problem with the compiler.