ecmwf / pdbufr

High-level BUFR interface for ecCodes
Apache License 2.0
23 stars 8 forks source link

Memory leak #42

Closed sandorkertesz closed 1 year ago

sandorkertesz commented 1 year ago

Fixes #40

codecov-commenter commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Base: 94.55% // Head: 94.82% // Increases project coverage by +0.27% :tada:

Coverage data is based on head (da67683) compared to base (d248973). Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #42 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 94.55% 94.82% +0.27% ========================================== Files 14 14 Lines 900 909 +9 Branches 113 117 +4 ========================================== + Hits 851 862 +11 + Misses 40 39 -1 + Partials 9 8 -1 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/ecmwf/pdbufr/pull/42?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ecmwf) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [pdbufr/bufr\_structure.py](https://codecov.io/gh/ecmwf/pdbufr/pull/42/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ecmwf#diff-cGRidWZyL2J1ZnJfc3RydWN0dXJlLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [pdbufr/high\_level\_bufr/codesmessage.py](https://codecov.io/gh/ecmwf/pdbufr/pull/42/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ecmwf#diff-cGRidWZyL2hpZ2hfbGV2ZWxfYnVmci9jb2Rlc21lc3NhZ2UucHk=) | `57.57% <0.00%> (+3.03%)` | :arrow_up: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ecmwf). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ecmwf)

:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.