Closed MridulS closed 2 months ago
@MridulS,
Sounds like a good idea, but tests are failing ...
A quick look seems to indicate the failing tests are unrelated to @MridulS's changes. I'll take a look later today
Attention: Patch coverage is 87.50000%
with 4 lines
in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 71.71%. Comparing base (
df9b60c
) to head (bca2586
).
Files | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
HARK/ConsumptionSaving/ConsRiskyContribModel.py | 0.00% | 2 Missing :warning: |
HARK/tests/OpenCLtest.py | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
HARK/utilities.py | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Merging this now. The 4 lines alleged by codecov not to be covered don't appear to actually exist-- it won't show me any uncovered changes.
This move the pre-commit config to use the inbuilt ruff formatter and ruff for linter all over HARK.