Addresses #86 - adding ALL the shields.io badges with a new --badge-style option.
Motivation and Context
Have you tested this? If so, how?
I have included unit & functional tests.
Checklist for PR author(s)
[x] Changes are covered by unit tests (no major decrease in code coverage %).
[x] All tests pass.
[x] Docstring coverage is 100% via tox -e docs or interrogate -c pyproject.toml (I mean, we should set a good example :smile:).
[x] Updates to documentation:
[x] Document any relevant additions/changes in README.rst.
[x] Manually update both the README.rstanddocs/index.rst for any new/changed CLI flags.
[x] Any changed/added classes/methods/functions have appropriate versionadded, versionchanged, or deprecateddirectives. Find the appropriate next version in the project's __init__.py file.
Release note
Add support for different badge styles (`#86 <https://github.com/econchick/interrogate/issues/86>`_).
Hey, I just made a Pull Request!
Description
Addresses #86 - adding ALL the shields.io badges with a new
--badge-style
option.Motivation and Context
Have you tested this? If so, how?
I have included unit & functional tests.
Checklist for PR author(s)
tox -e docs
orinterrogate -c pyproject.toml
(I mean, we should set a good example :smile:).README.rst
.README.rst
anddocs/index.rst
for any new/changed CLI flags.versionadded
,versionchanged
, ordeprecated
directives. Find the appropriate next version in the project's__init__.py
file.Release note