Closed DrCaFr closed 2 years ago
We left it for discussion for a following release. It should not be a blocker for xmcf v3.1
Discussion during 2021-10-21 meeting:
instance
is optional.instance
is of alphanumeric type. (Following e.g. STEP standard.) Issue was not closed to milestone WG meeting 2021-10 - hence, postponed to next one.
proposal for
@economidis-nick: Review completed with commit b42b379201563b8040ec1ebc9a3566489e3a2908.
@mweinert611: Which further steps do we need for acceptance?
Normal process is the apporval in the full working group. Just an idea we can discuss tomorrow. I would also not have an issue with sharing the proposal via email with the full team and ask for approval or better for rejections/concerns if any. Can be discussed tomorrow.
Normal process is the approval in the full working group.
Great! I just created an according new label "ready for release".
Was closed by mistake.
implemented in doc and agreed by full working group
June 2018 meeting provided following feedback from Production Planning application: