Open joncison opened 4 years ago
done, see https://github.com/edamontology/edamverify/blob/master/queries/iDNumericalDuplication.ipynb
would benefit from a review at some stage @albangaignard @hmenager
an interesting footnote on this one (reflected in the code) is that EDAM subsets - being defined as XML attributes in the RDF/XML - are not amenable e.g. to FILTER
SPARQL queries, which only work on XML element values. It took me a while to realise this! Had it been otherwise, more of the logic could have been put in the SPARQL query. Correct me if I'm wrong here, Alban!
The numerical component of an EDAM concept ID is duplicated in some other concept ID.