Open rlittle08 opened 1 month ago
Currently all of these 2xx statuses are treated as "success." The CLI output shows counts by status code, but I believe the structured logs don't split them out. We could change that behavior if needed? Maybe you can propose a revision to the structure of the --results-file
format to include explicit counts by status?
As we're working on surfacing lightbeam logs in tables, we realized it is unclear whether records were 200 vs. 201. This is important tracking info - if 200, we should display as such, so analysts/DEs/TDLs understand that the records were found to be "not new".
Similarly, it's unclear to me how/whether 204 status codes are handled in the logging