Closed Courvoisier13 closed 5 years ago
yes, what i'm saying is that this should be:
$for(include-after)$
$\include{include-after}$
$endfor$
Look at the other include:
$for(header-includes)$
$header-includes$
$endfor$
It does the same. It is full textual substituion.
Hi,
The include-after is missing a \input{} from the template.tex. The code
is correctly placed after the bibliography but if we want to include a .tex file, it needs to have a
\input{include-after}
. Otherwise if we putinclude-after: somefile.tex
in the yaml, then just the words "somefile.tex" will apprear in the .tex.Putting
\input{somefile.tex}
in the yaml allows for a workaround. but it's nicer to just put the .tex in the yaml header