Closed ikashnitsky closed 4 years ago
What are you using? I always use real bibliographies with natbib, and that (as I recall) works here too. As it does eg in every vignette I make with it:
That is from package anytime
which I happen to be debugging something in right now.
I found somewhere a hacky way to use custom csl styles with pinp
output:
bookdown::pdf_book:
toc: false
latex_engine: xelatex
base_format: pinp::pinp
citation_package: none
pandoc_args: [ "--csl", "psp.csl" ]
The reference list looks like this
I realise this must be LaTeX behaviour outside pinp. Now found a couple of bare LaTeX lines that fix it, from here
# Bibliography
\setlength{\parindent}{-0.2in}
\setlength{\leftskip}{0.2in}
\noindent
Sorry for extra bothering
It's a rite of passage. The last time I "putzed" with reference section formatting (by editing a .bst file, in the pre-csl days) was as a grad student.
Just don't fall for it. Use natbib and a standard style and move on. My advice which you're free to ignore...
Yeah, the universe of citation styles is the best proof that [despite conspiracy theories] the world government is an absolutely impossible thing. The only other example that may be as convincing is
Is there a way to re-format the reference list so that the indentation is hanging, ie
Instead of
? It just looks cleaner and reads easier