Closed eddelbuettel closed 3 years ago
Maybe add a documentation note the README
vignette and pinp
layout call mentioning this is supported?
https://github.com/eddelbuettel/pinp/blob/4fc965b9a9bd35a3899c431651de750cfe9fa7f9/R/pinp.R#L68-L71
Could do but not urgent and can be done later. It's optional anyway at the pandoc
level. Just that before the additional it broke :crying_cat_face: and now it no longer does.
It also very much does not need a YAML option. Hence "maybe not".
The other issue for 'maybe not' is that the side-by-side view of code .... pretty much needs one-column mode which does not fit into our default vignette (as easily). We could try to prove a point and have two columns side-by-side inside one column but it likely going to be awkward.
Your reminder about documenting options is good though.
For completeness, I tried it. Outer \begin{widetext} ... \end{widetext}
then clashes with the width setting pandoc
supports. Switching with \onecolumn
and back to \twocolumn
works, but forces a pagebreak. So not really a candidate for our default vignette.
See #87 for discussion. Works as tested on the vignette that previously needed it in the header.