Open seyfer opened 5 years ago
These tests were run two years ago, so it's possible they are outdated.
You can run the tests yourself if you like and see if the results match your expectations
@eddyerburgh
npm test
> vue-test-utils-perf-test@1.0.0 test /var/www/vue-unit-test-perf-comparison
> ./test.sh
getting average of 10 tests in tape ...
(standard_in) 1: syntax error
(standard_in) 1: syntax error
(standard_in) 1: syntax error
(standard_in) 1: syntax error
seyfer@seed:~$ npm -v
6.9.0
seyfer@seed:~$ node -v
v11.15.0
cat RESULTS.md
| Runner | 10 tests | 100 tests | 1000 tests | 5000 tests |
| :------------ |:--------- |:--------- |:--------- |:--------- |
| tape | s | s | s | s |
| jest | s | s | s | s |
| mocha-webpack | s | s | s | s |
| karma-mocha | s | s | s | s |
| ava | s | s | s | s |
@eddyerburgh fixed in #4
my results are
| Runner | 10 tests | 100 tests | 1000 tests | 5000 tests |
| :------------ |:--------- |:--------- |:--------- |:--------- |
| tape | .23s | .21s | .22s | .34s |
| jest | .39s | .30s | .23s | .24s |
| mocha-webpack | .21s | .21s | .35s | .26s |
| karma-mocha | .24s | .21s | .22s | .25s |
| ava | .21s | .21s | .22s | .27s |
| Runner | 10 tests | 100 tests | 1000 tests | 5000 tests |
| :------------ |:--------- |:--------- |:--------- |:--------- |
| tape | .21s | .21s | .23s | .33s |
| jest | .22s | .37s | .28s | .24s |
| mocha-webpack | .25s | .24s | .30s | .32s |
| karma-mocha | .26s | .21s | .29s | .24s |
| ava | .21s | .21s | .22s | .23s |
which I still find strange. :)
From this AirBnb article, I see that they had a completely different experience than I see in this repo profile results.
https://medium.com/airbnb-engineering/unlocking-test-performance-migrating-from-mocha-to-jest-2796c508ec50
Does it mean that these results are outdated? Or they do not consider Jest built-in parallelization feature?
Please update the results.