eddyleo / doubango

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/doubango
0 stars 0 forks source link

Test A.2.4 Stream-based Transport_3 fails. #173

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?

Please use labels and text to provide additional information.
Test  A.2.4 Stream-based Transport_3 fails.  The expected output from RFC 4465 
is MESSAGE_TOO_SHORT; the ‘MSG: MESSAGE_TOO_SHORT’ is generated from my 
wrapper tests but there is no NACK.  Doubango tests report a different message 
and errors.

Output from my tests…

================================================

=== Testing A.2.4.  Stream-based Transport_3 ===

================================================

***ERROR: function: "tcomp_message_ctor()"

file: ".\src\tcomp_message.c"

line: "261"

MSG: MESSAGE_TOO_SHORT

***ERROR: function: "tcomp_decompressordisp_internalDecompress()"

file: ".\src\tcomp_decompressordisp.c"

line: "183"

MSG: Failed to create new sigcomp message.

xdecompression-failure: MESSAGE_TOO_SHORT

FAIL: MISSING NACK

=== A.2.4.  Stream-based Transport_3 status: FAIL ===

=====================================================

Output from Doubango tests…

=== Testing A.2.4.  Stream-based Transport_4 ===

***ERROR: function: "initStateless()"

file: ".\src\tcomp_message.c"

line: "170"

MSG: INVALID_CODE_LOCATION

***ERROR: function: "tcomp_decompressordisp_internalDecompress()"

file: ".\src\tcomp_decompressordisp.c"

line: "183"

MSG: Failed to create new sigcomp message.

xoutpout: NO

xcycles: YES

output size: 0

Original issue reported on code.google.com by boss...@yahoo.fr on 8 Jan 2013 at 11:40

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 10 Jan 2013 at 12:11

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago
Fixed in SVN r805+
/!\Please note that some torture tests require previous ones and the first have 
to be started with clean manager state.

Original comment by boss...@yahoo.fr on 10 Jan 2013 at 12:46