Convert source from CoffeeScript to JavaScript or TypeScript or Civet?

edemaine / fold

FOLD file format for origami models, crease patterns, etc.

MIT License

314 stars 48 forks source link

Convert source from CoffeeScript to JavaScript or TypeScript or Civet? #45

Closed mayakraft closed 6 months ago

mayakraft commented 1 year ago

Just wanted to throw this out there to gauge a response:

Can we convert the src/ folder from coffee script into ES6 Javascript or Typescript?

This would be for the sole purpose of getting more code contributions from the community. If it resulted in no increase in contribution activity I would feel like I wasted everyone's time. Can we leave this issue open for a while, and if anyone has feelings about this would you like to leave a response?

1,300-1,700 lines of coffee script code, no tests to port.

mayakraft commented 1 year ago

Personally, I think ES6 Javascript (with JSDoc style comments) over Typescript for a few reasons:

simpler build tooling
strong types slow down development time
the flexibility it allows for projects in exploratory phases
can still generate .d.ts file with pure Javascript and JSDocs link

Rich Harris took the words out of my mouth recently. link

edemaine commented 1 year ago

Related to #25 which we should definitely do one way or another.

Personally I'd rather go in the other direction and port to Civet. This would be an easier transition (as it's mostly CoffeeScript compatible), and because it's largely TypeScript compatible (most shorthand is optional), maybe it would be better for others contributing? (Not sure - it still might be intimidating.)

mayakraft commented 1 year ago

That's cool. in that case, Civet might be the best solution concerning types and ease of translation. Not sure I would bet on it if the aim is to increase community contributions. In that case I might still push for JS/TS as the safer bet. But, again, whatever people think! happy to hear more thoughts.

MuTsunTsai commented 7 months ago

If the motivation is to invite more contribution, I will certainly recommend TypeScript over alternatives. TypeScript is the de facto standard of JS development, while Civet is, to be honest, almost never discussed within the JS community, despite the hard work by @edemaine. Some numbers to support my point: https://npmtrends.com/@danielx/civet-vs-coffeescript-vs-typescript

mayakraft commented 6 months ago

I notice this happened on another thread. thanks for the help @Mokshit06 !