eden-network / tx-explain

MIT License
2 stars 2 forks source link

Ethscriptions/Facet input data #6

Open zanknaf opened 7 months ago

zanknaf commented 7 months ago

Some self transactions have input data for Ethscriptions and/or Facet that looks like trace data, so models try to interprets this as a normal ERC20 transfer or mint. Example: data:,{"p":"erc-20","op":"mint","tick":"shte","id":"2667","amt":"1000"} Transaction

This is problematic because the model is not very accurate interpreting this data and just makes additional details from thin air.

Example transaction: 0x8379e92c883d86cf581449c0ba7aa8214f6e4c6ae6685d153f8d9da79105e27f

Proposed solution: Instruct model in the prompt to ignore input data in self transfers or fine tune another model on this specific input data type.

Frequency: Low Severity: Medium