edgarrmondragon / citric

A client to the LimeSurvey Remote Control API 2, written in modern Python.
https://citric.rtfd.io
MIT License
26 stars 8 forks source link

test: Test with lowest direct dependencies #1140

Closed edgarrmondragon closed 4 months ago

edgarrmondragon commented 4 months ago

Summary

Validate lower dependency bounds.

Test Plan

CI.

Checklist

For both the title of the PR and the changelog entry, prefer simple past tense or constructions with "now". For example:


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://citric--1140.org.readthedocs.build/en/1140/

socket-security[bot] commented 4 months ago

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
pypi/astroid@3.2.1 eval, filesystem, network, shell 0 2.05 MB AWhetter, BryceGuinta, Claudiu.Popa, ...6 more
pypi/chardet@4.0.0 environment, filesystem 0 7.12 MB Daniel.Blanchard, MarkPilgrim, ajung, ...2 more
pypi/idna@2.10 eval, filesystem, network 0 445 kB kjd
pypi/requests@2.25.1 environment, eval, filesystem, network, shell, unsafe 0 394 kB Lukasa, graffatcolmingov, nateprewitt
pypi/urllib3@1.26.18 environment, eval, filesystem, network, unsafe 0 1.18 MB SethMichaelLarson, shazow

🚮 Removed packages: pypi/astroid@3.2.0, pypi/astroid@3.2.0, pypi/typing-extensions@4.11.0, pypi/typing-extensions@4.11.0

View full report↗︎

codecov[bot] commented 4 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (c5454fd) to head (dc8e37d). Report is 29 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1140 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 10 10 Lines 482 482 Branches 25 25 ========================================= Hits 482 482 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/edgarrmondragon/citric/pull/1140/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Edgar+Ram%C3%ADrez+Mondrag%C3%B3n) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [integration](https://app.codecov.io/gh/edgarrmondragon/citric/pull/1140/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Edgar+Ram%C3%ADrez+Mondrag%C3%B3n) | `91.28% <ø> (ø)` | | | [unit](https://app.codecov.io/gh/edgarrmondragon/citric/pull/1140/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Edgar+Ram%C3%ADrez+Mondrag%C3%B3n) | `93.77% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Edgar+Ram%C3%ADrez+Mondrag%C3%B3n#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 4 months ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud