Closed IagoLast closed 7 years ago
I think you can also remove the function from Gf256.
I agree that circular dependencies are bad sign, but duplication should also be avoided.
Up ?
I will close this as stale, but you can reopen this MR if you have corrected the code
Sorry I forgot about this, a new PR with a better fix has been created.
GF256poly was requiring GF256 only for using the addorsubstract function, now this funcion is defined in the GF256poly class so it has no dependencies