Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Like you said, the MIT license is as liberal as can be, so the issue report is
to
submit to the Drupal project team, really. We don't intend to add additional
specific
licenses to suit the needs of other libraries.
And Drupal does allow to mix and match libraries, however it will not host code
which
has not been released under GPL license. From the Drupal forum: "Commonly, when
people want to include non-GPL libraries in their project, they leave them out
of
CVS, but include extra install instructions for downloading the library
elsewhere.
Please consider such a solution to this licensing issue."
Original comment by bobbyvandersluis
on 27 Apr 2009 at 11:36
Bobby,
thank you for a prompt response. That is what we do now - instructions to
download separately. However this
creates number of problems:
1) It's not easy for an average user
2) Often API changes from version to version and an ideal integration should
include specific versions, whilst
website of external libraries commonly have just the latest version for easy
download.
Since dual-licensing is a common practice, I was hoping you might consider
this, especially since Drupal is
one of the most important open-source CMS systems (if not - the most), not just
"yet another project" :) The
requirement for GPL is not unique to Drupal, either, so it could ease the
adoption of swfobject library in
general?
Thank you
Original comment by ira...@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2009 at 12:21
Why don't you use one of the specific versions hosted at Google AJAX Libraries
API?
http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/hosted_library
This avoids both version issues and the need to host it yourself.
Original comment by bobbyvandersluis
on 27 Apr 2009 at 12:41
Hm, nice suggestion :)
Thank you!
Original comment by ira...@gmail.com
on 30 Apr 2009 at 9:53
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ira...@gmail.com
on 27 Apr 2009 at 10:40