Closed kmk3 closed 3 years ago
@kmk3
Thank you for your contribution!
As you already seen on editorconfig.org, we are using hand-written style logo.
Using the original logo maybe okay, but creating a hand-written style logo will fit in with rest of the logos.
Could you add the image on your PR? If you not in hurry, I can create the image and put it on this PR's comment.
@xuhdev what do you think about this?
Yeah I agree with @Pittan . @kmk3 Could you share the logo image? We will redraw the logo to fit to the style of the rest of the page (thanks to @Pittan and Kat for the conversion)
@xuhdev I think the image is attached to this PR.
@Pittan commented yesterday:
@kmk3
Thank you for your contribution!
No problem.
As you already seen on editorconfig.com, we are using hand-written style logo.
Funny thing; I had noticed that in the past, but this time I was just looking at the vim and vscode logos on the site and thought that they looked pretty similar to the originals (or that they were the originals), so I just went and grabbed the official vscodium logo.
Using the original logo maybe okay, but creating a hand-written style logo will fit in with rest of the logos.
Indeed, and I like the hand-written style.
Could you add the image on your PR? If you not in hurry, I can create the image and put it on this PR's comment.
I have no drawing skills and there is no hurry, so feel free to do that :p
By the way, what are the tools used to create these logos?
@kmk3
I have no drawing skills and there is no hurry, so feel free to do that :p
By the way, what are the tools used to create these logos?
Thanks! I'll create a logo image and attach to this PR's comment later today. I'm using Photoshop + iPad Sidecar to redraw logos. (Maybe too much for this kind of task :))
@kmk3 Sorry to be late 🙇 Here's the hand-written version of VSCodium logo.
Wait... may be we should add a border around the logo (It will blend to the background but we should avoid it) Just a sec...
Awesome! @Pittan Would you like me to add the logo in a separate PR or would you prefer opening a PR by yourself?
@xuhdev Thank you! I was thinking that @kmk3 will swap this image to the image included in this PR.
@Pittan commented on Sep 19:
@kmk3 Sorry to be late bow
It's alright.
Here's the hand-written version of VSCodium logo.
Nice, it looks very close to the original.
@Pittan commented on Sep 20:
I was thinking that @kmk3 will swap this image to the image included in this PR.
My thought as well; I've swapped and force-pushed. I put the credits on the commit message.
Thanks @kmk3 . Could you add the following to your git message? This should automatically credit @Pittan (replace AT
and DOT
with @
and .
)
Co-authored-by: pittan <amon.keishima AT pittankopta DOT net>
@xuhdev commented on Sep 20:
Thanks @kmk3 . Could you add the following to your git message? This should automatically credit @Pittan (replace
AT
andDOT
with@
and.
)Co-authored-by: pittan <amon.keishima AT pittankopta DOT net>
Sure, but are you certain that the above is correct? On @Pittan's latest non-merge commit (commit 3e54962 ("Add GitLab (#133)")), the author is listed as:
Amon Keishima <pittan AT pittankopta DOT net>
@kmk3
pittan at pittankopta dot net
is an alias to amon.keishima at ...
so it doesn't matter which one I / you choose :)
@Pittan commented on Oct 2:
@kmk3
pittan at pittankopta dot net
is an alias toamon.keishima at ...
so it doesn't matter which one I / you choose :)
Ah, good to know.
@kmk3 commented on Sep 21:
@xuhdev commented on Sep 20:
Thanks @kmk3 . Could you add the following to your git message? This should automatically credit @Pittan (replace
AT
andDOT
with@
and.
)Co-authored-by: pittan <amon.keishima AT pittankopta DOT net>
Sure, but are you certain that the above is correct? On @Pittan's latest non-merge commit (commit 3e54962 ("Add GitLab (#133)")), the author is listed as:
Amon Keishima <pittan AT pittankopta DOT net>
Now I noticed that I was checking the commits on this PR branch rather than on master (sorry about that). @Pittan's latest commit on master is 223cc0d ("Add Pluma"), so your original suggestion appears to be the more fitting one indeed.
I went with that one and force-pushed.
"binary releases of VS Code without MS branding/telemetry/licensing"
Since Visual Studio Code is present, might as well add the Free/Libre version of it.
Logo taken from: https://github.com/VSCodium/vscodium/blob/cb5e22e005a1e3373f5e0ee9bb79d182587db2df/src/resources/linux/code.png