I started working through the plan on the wiki, trying to make a clearly defined list of bulleted systematics. When finalized, these might need labelling with numbers or letters, so they can be referred to in the "tests". Or, the tests could be inserted after the description - and then, for clarity, we could provide a simple table at the top of the page with links to the individual systematics further down. Either way, let's iterate!
Note the small additions I made, just trying to clarify the thinking - please carry on with this! The clearer we write about the issues now, the easier it will be being efficient with the tests!
Thanks @drphilmarshall ! I updated the Systematic Error Action Plan on the wiki with the main changes I am making to the analysis in the new paper. Let me know you and @cdfassnacht have any comments.
I started working through the plan on the wiki, trying to make a clearly defined list of bulleted systematics. When finalized, these might need labelling with numbers or letters, so they can be referred to in the "tests". Or, the tests could be inserted after the description - and then, for clarity, we could provide a simple table at the top of the page with links to the individual systematics further down. Either way, let's iterate!
Note the small additions I made, just trying to clarify the thinking - please carry on with this! The clearer we write about the issues now, the easier it will be being efficient with the tests!