Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I have this issue as well. I am SPECIFICALLY looking for a Javascript fix for
the
multiple class selection bug in IE6, as a portion of one of my web apps relies
on
that functionality. I COULD rewrite it to avoid it, but it would be... very,
very ugly.
My specific case is a workflow system that uses combinations of classes to
specify
background images, for an element. To give you an idea:
/* Root Workflow Entrance */
.workflow .subEnter.root, .parallelWorkflow .subEnter.root
{background:url('Images/Workflow/rootBack.png') top left
repeat-y;height:inherit;}
.workflow.pending .subEnter.root, .parallelWorkflow.pending .subEnter.root
{background:url('Images/Workflow/rootBack.png') top left
repeat-y;height:inherit;}
/* Root Workflow Exit*/
.workflow .workflowStep.last .subExit.root, .parallelWorkflow .workflowStep.last
.subExit.root {background:url('Images/Workflow/stepExitApproved.png') bottom
left
no-repeat;}
.workflow.pending .workflowStep.last .subExit.root, .parallelWorkflow.pending
.workflowStep.last .subExit.root
{background:url('Images/Workflow/stepExitPending.png') bottom left no-repeat;}
/* ParallelWorkflow continuous bar background */
.parallelWorkflow {background:url('Images/Workflow/parallelBackApproved.png')
top
left repeat-y;}
.parallelWorkflow.pending
{background:url('Images/Workflow/parallelBackPending.png')
top left repeat-y;}
/* Subworkflow Entrances */
.workflow .subEnter, .parallelWorkflow .subEnter
{background:url('Images/Workflow/subEnterApproved.png') top left no-repeat;}
.workflow.pending .subEnter, .parallelWorkflow.pending .subEnter
{background:url('Images/Workflow/subEnterPending.png') top left no-repeat;}
/* Subworkflow Exits */
/* Special exits for review step*/
.workflow .workflowStep.last .subExit
{background:url('Images/Workflow/subExitApproved.png') bottom left no-repeat;}
.workflow .workflowStep.last.pending .subExit
{background:url('Images/Workflow/subExitPending.png') bottom left no-repeat;}
That's just a part of it. I do not see IE8.js making any difference in these
cases
though, which leads me to suspect that I am seeing the same thing that Eric is
seeing. Has any progress been made on this?
Original comment by i8b...@gmail.com
on 5 Nov 2009 at 9:23
Bah. That was a hard bug to fix!
Original comment by dean.edw...@gmail.com
on 11 Feb 2010 at 12:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
eric.mcc...@gmail.com
on 25 Mar 2008 at 5:22Attachments: