search

edwardhumi / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Redundant multiplicity notation in DG #10

Open edwardhumi opened 5 months ago

edwardhumi commented 5 months ago

In the class diagram on page 6 and 10, there is a multiplicity of 0..*, this could be replaced with * instead since they are the same.

image.png

image.png

nus-pe-script commented 5 months ago

Team's Response

Yes, but it does not hinder the user's ability to understand the DG, since 0.. and are both accepted forms of the same multiplicity.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

Reason for disagreement: Yes but there is no need to include the 0.. as it is usually used for bounded multiplicity 0..n

## :question: Issue severity Team chose [`severity.VeryLow`] Originally [`severity.Low`] - [ ] I disagree **Reason for disagreement:** [replace this with your explanation]