Closed pxlhuntr closed 6 years ago
When following Good Practices (see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Moderation#Recommended_use_.2F_good_practices ), the only reason why you would Reject is vandalism, spam or otherwise ill-intentioned edit. It this situation, you don't have to explain to user why you rejected his/her change.
If the edit itself is useless/incorrect but was made with good intent (e.g. incorrectly formatted, or not interesting, or outside the scope of project - e.g. adding excessive plot details into Wikipedia article about film), it should be Approved and then reverted as usual. In this situation, reason can be specified when reverting.
Reject was designed as a one-click operation to save moderator's time.
Adding a reason field implies having a "Reject form", i.e. making it more time consuming to moderate, i.e. making the extension worse for those who follow Good Practices.
I think adding a text field for why a change was rejected would be extremely useful for feedback.