Closed rsbivand closed 1 year ago
Shall I merge everything or only the missing void
decls?
Please wait, I'm checking on an instrumented platform, and there is also an unconditional use of spTransform. I'll let you know when I'm ready. Reviewing the existing pile of commits is needed too.
OK, I think this is OK now, -Wstrict-prototypes
fixed and also checks in status 0L
with no retiring packages present. aggregate()
, disagregate()
and over()
need attention for status 2L
and sf instead of rgeos, for the next release. Going with this now (with vignette compaction "both") should be OK.
Should I check on the instrumented system?
[00check.log](https://github.com/edzer/sp/files/9935927/00check.log
$ R CMD build --compact-vignettes="both" sp
_SP_EVOLUTION_STATUS_=2 _R_CHECK_FORCE_SUGGESTS_=FALSE R_LIBS=/home/rsb/topics/R/devel-libs PATH=/home/rsb/topics/R/trunk/build/bin:$PATH R CMD check sp_1.5-1.tar.gz
(On train, no signal in tunnels)
Thanks, submitted to CRAN.
Only https://github.com/edzer/sp/commit/b351d7bf1b84e231ea75df24626e64c61c6632d6 relevant now to resolve https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rgeos.html and https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_sp.html (and partly https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_rgdal.html).