This paper analyses incidents in Toronto by focusing on the role of fire safety systems like fire alarms and sprinklers. The paper tries to asses whether having fire alarms and sprinklers decrease the severity of fire incidents.
Comments on each section
Repo:
The overall layout of the repo is really good and clear. It shows no evidence of being as cool paper, has an LLM statement and does not contain a DS_Store. The read me is very organized and informative.
Abstract:
Very short and straight to the point. Tells us exactly what was done.
Introduction:
Gives a very brief background for the topic. More information can be added regarding the broader context to motivate the paper. It does not make clear the gap that needs to be filled.
Data:
First paragraph of the data section is very informative. The rest is in progress.
This topic has a lot of literature on it so including more external sources to you introductions on discussion section could be very helpful. This would show that you have read what others have to say about this topic.
Finish the paper (I'm sure it will be really nice when it's finished)
Opening statement summary
This paper analyses incidents in Toronto by focusing on the role of fire safety systems like fire alarms and sprinklers. The paper tries to asses whether having fire alarms and sprinklers decrease the severity of fire incidents.
Comments on each section
Repo:
The overall layout of the repo is really good and clear. It shows no evidence of being as cool paper, has an LLM statement and does not contain a DS_Store. The read me is very organized and informative.
Abstract:
Very short and straight to the point. Tells us exactly what was done.
Introduction:
Gives a very brief background for the topic. More information can be added regarding the broader context to motivate the paper. It does not make clear the gap that needs to be filled.
Data:
First paragraph of the data section is very informative. The rest is in progress.
Results & Discussion:
In progress
Strong positive points
Critical improvements needed
Suggestions for improvement:
Please consider adding/changing/removing:
Evaluation:
R cited:1 LLM Statement: 1 Title: 1 Author,date,repo: 2 Abstract: 4 Introduction: 2 Data: 2 measurement: 0 Prose: 2 Cross reference: 2 captions: 2 graphs, tables, etc: 0 Referencing: 4 commits: 2 sketches: 0 simulation: 4 tests:4 reproducibility: 4 code styling: 1 general excellence: 0
Estimated mark:
(as of now) 59.4 out of 100.
Reason:
Based on the rubric