The existing conversion was slightly incorrect because it was for
pound to kilogram conversion (multiplication instead of division) and
not for the other way around.
Another side note as future reference, there's also another different
alternative, i,e from kilogram to pound: kg * 2.205 (or 2.204)
The existing conversion was slightly incorrect because it was for pound to kilogram conversion (multiplication instead of division) and not for the other way around.
Another side note as future reference, there's also another different alternative, i,e from kilogram to pound: kg * 2.205 (or 2.204)
Fix #503