Closed JKrag closed 4 years ago
@RandomSort Do you agree with this approach? Then I will try to simplify this exercise.
Yes, that makes sense!
man. 22. jul. 2019 13.59 skrev Jan Krag notifications@github.com:
@RandomSort https://github.com/RandomSort Do you agree with this approach? Then I will try to simplify this exercise.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/praqma-training/git-katas/issues/177?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAEOHK4AUATDUCLNS5CLORTQAWOLLA5CNFSM4HAEUBYKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD2PWFMQ#issuecomment-513761970, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEOHK6CGWD3FVKTTACXSITQAWOLLANCNFSM4HAEUBYA .
The basic revert should probably focus on revert, i.e. not mess with multiple branches at the same time. I believe a linear example where we revert the last commit and maybe a HEAD~3 commit would serve better to teach this, and avoid some confusion for people that are not quite comfy with branches yet.