Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Put results in the wiki, TestCodeCoverageSummary.
Original comment by the.good...@gmail.com
on 27 May 2008 at 4:39
test
Original comment by the.good...@gmail.com
on 27 May 2008 at 4:50
One problem with doing this is that 'protest' starts multiple processes, so
simple
code coverage analysis won't work (figleaf and coverage.py both work by setting
the
tracehook, which is not carried across subprocess invocations)...
Original comment by the.good...@gmail.com
on 29 May 2008 at 3:38
Should be part of 0.8's "improved test coverage"
Original comment by cjlee...@gmail.com
on 11 Sep 2008 at 4:12
pygrtest_common is now included & properly passes figleaf settings on to the
child
processes.
Original comment by the.good...@gmail.com
on 17 Dec 2008 at 1:54
Original comment by mare...@gmail.com
on 21 Feb 2009 at 1:28
Hi Titus,
please write up how to run the code coverage analysis and give that to Marek,
so he
can verify that this issue is fixed.
Thanks!
Chris
Original comment by cjlee...@gmail.com
on 4 Mar 2009 at 8:54
Original comment by mare...@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2009 at 12:54
Original comment by mare...@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2009 at 12:59
python runtest.py --coverage
Original comment by the.good...@gmail.com
on 13 Mar 2009 at 1:31
This indeed works as it should, closing the issue. Note that this for now
megatests
aren't analysed, as they shall remain tied to the old test framework until all
major
issues with the new one have been resolved.
Original comment by mare...@gmail.com
on 26 Mar 2009 at 1:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
the.good...@gmail.com
on 27 May 2008 at 4:35