Closed stephan2012 closed 1 year ago
Uargh!
I spent quite a bit of time re-reviewing the syntaxes.
Now I am unsure.
Yeah, go ahead.
Might as well do that PR.
My earlier attempt was to consolidate the variables but even now Ive lost track of who else needs this.
PR, please, for my prompt acceptance.
Will do.
Looks like something went wrong with the issue mentioned in #53 and the fix in https://github.com/egberts/bind9_parser/commit/dd9fe1acdeb74029fa966b15287ba22062de342c: The fix adds the dot to
charset_tls_id_base
, while it should go tocharset_key_id_base
as proposed in my PR https://github.com/egberts/bind9_parser/pull/54.@egberts Do you want me to submit a new PR?