Closed ivannis closed 11 years ago
Thanks! Fix my comment & then, I will merge it :+1:
@ivannis I'm sorry but I have recently updated the source to extract the business code in a deciated lib for reusability. I have totally forgotten your PR & these changes makes it unmergeable & invalid :s
If you can make a PR against the egeloen/ivory-google-map repo to add the headmap layer & update this PR to impact the bundle, you're awesome! :)
Anyway, if you can't, I will reuse your code to implement it but currently, I'm fixing issues.
@ivannis and @egeloen
Is there an ETA on this feature?
Would be greatly appreciated.
@theZizoo Moving this feature to the egeloen/ivory-google-map repo is currently at the end of my TODO list. Anyway, if you have some time, you can do it. It will be very appreciated too :)
@egeloen I'm back, I will make soon a PR to integrate this functionality :)
@ivannis Thx
+1 to the PR!
@ivannis Any news?
After looking a little bit more of what Google Map API provides for optimize a large number of markers, it seems that many techniques are available (see here).
The implementation of this PR only uses the Marker Cluster approach. It would be great if we can provide different "strategies" (Marker Cluster, Grid-based, ...) & switch easily between these different strategies.
What's your opinion?
For the record, I will work on this feature as It seems the most asked by the community & @ivannis seems busy right now. I come back ASAP with something working :)
Hi Egeloen !!
Any news about this feature?
I know it is a very important feature for you but I prefer take my time & come with the right implementation instead of making something not perfect which will cause further BC breaks. I have merged all mergeable contributions :) Now this one is my next priority.
The main issue with this feature is I would like to allow people to use different cluster strategies instead of a single one...
Before continue my work on this feature, I would like to get feedback on how would you like it? First of all, are we talking about client or server marker clustering?
@egeloen thanks for picking this up again, and all your effort on this great bundle.
Personally, I would prefer server side clustering.
Cheers
For the record, I have pushed my proposal for marker clustering. The bundle needs some love for integrating these changes which breaks BC for map helper.
Adding clustering using the MarkerClusterer library for Google Maps v3