`taxonomy:9606` is an iffy example

[cthoyt]

It's really good to mention highly used namespaces, but the taxonomy prefix is a perfect example of how different communities reuse the same prefix to actually mean different things

Identifiers.org didn't do us a big favor in being non-specific with this one, and the Bioregistry tried to steer this on course by using NCBITaxon as the preferred prefix for this resource

I don't think that the target audience will appreciate this nuance in a short document, so i'd suggest using a different example

[larsgw]

Perhaps col:6MB3T?

[egonw]

Thanks, applied.