Check why inverse variance not taken for categorical rating

[egouldo]

For the univariate analysis of the Deviation Score, I don't see mention of weighting based on the inverse variance however looking at the analysis, it looks like the authors did this for continuous rating (https://github.com/egouldo/ManyEcoEvo/blob/main/R/fit_boxcox_ratings_cont.R#L44) but it's commented out for categorical rating (https://github.com/egouldo/ManyEcoEvo/blob/main/R/fit_boxcox_ratings_cat.R#L52). I'm wondering why?

Can't recall exactly why, and maybe this is an error, but from memory I think there were some problems with model fit for the categorical ratings and inverse variance?

• [ ] Check the git blame and notes for this line
• [ ] Rerun with what was preregistered - model fit etc. ok??

[egouldo]

This is addressed in the ManyEcoEvo package, see https://github.com/egouldo/ManyEcoEvo/issues/35

• [ ] upgrade to latest version and then rerun