rename duplicated headings

[egouldo]

Thanks Tim, I think I was just relying on the two headers being under their respective sub-headers for the precise meaning of each sub-heading being conveyed. But it’s probably best to specify exactly what outputs these belong to, so I’ll update them.

Elliot.

---

On 1 Jun 2024, at 6:34 am, Tim Parker parkerth@whitman.edu wrote:

Note this redundancy between these two supplement sections

A.2.3 Post-hoc analysis: Exploring the effect of removing analyses with poor peer-review ratings on heterogeneity

B.1.1.2 Post-hoc analysis: Exploring the effect of removing analyses with poor peer-review ratings on heterogeneity

[egouldo]

Ok, these two subsections are definitely duplicate sections, but note that the text in both is different and so is the code.

• [ ] Check which code / text to keep
• [ ] Intended location for this text is in SM2 NOT SM1

[egouldo]

Also, it seems that more than just 1 analysis was dropped from the euc data when only unpublishable removed, contrary to the following text:

For the Eucalytpus analyses, removing ‘unpublishable’ analyses meant dropping the outlier ‘Brooklyn-2-2-1’ which made a substantial difference to the amount of observerd deviation from the meta-analytic mean.