Over at email-rfc2822-validator we are looking at EmailValidator4J with great interest. Our approach is a time-tested comprehensive regex based parser, but we always knew regular expressions are sub optimal for parsing email addresses.
So we had a quick look at EmailValidator4J and made a few observations, it would be great if you could take a look and maybe address some of them?
Hi Eduardo,
Over at email-rfc2822-validator we are looking at EmailValidator4J with great interest. Our approach is a time-tested comprehensive regex based parser, but we always knew regular expressions are sub optimal for parsing email addresses.
So we had a quick look at EmailValidator4J and made a few observations, it would be great if you could take a look and maybe address some of them?
#8: Investigate and possibly deprecate email-rfc2822-validator in favor of EmailValidator4J