search

ehealthplatformstandards / FHIRStandardVersioningStrategy

How will we handle the ongoing evolution of the international FHIR standard in Belgium?
0 stars 0 forks source link

Differences between R4 and R5, and who wants to use them? #1

Open bdc-ehealth opened 1 year ago

bdc-ehealth commented 1 year ago

An overview of the changes between R4 and R5 can be found here: https://hl7.org/fhir/R5/diff.html

JensPenny commented 1 year ago

http://hl7.org/fhir/medication-definition-module.html looks interesting. Especially if we can make SamV2 / samVx definitions available through these resources. R4B is another version, but that version has breaking concepts so we better don't use it.

bdc-ehealth commented 1 year ago

An overview of the conversion accuracy can be found here: https://hl7.org/fhir/extensions/conversion-registry.html

bdc-ehealth commented 10 months ago

The SAM V2 to FHIR project wants to use FHIR Int'l R5 (at least) to provide an API.

costateixeira commented 10 months ago

I am not sure the project has an intrinsic desire to use FHIR; But for the regulatory medicinal products R5 is the first working version.

On Fri, Jan 5, 2024 at 11:44 AM Bart Decuypere (eHealth) < @.***> wrote:

The SAM V2 to FHIR project wants to use FHIR Int'l R5 (at least) to provide an API.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ehealthplatformstandards/FHIRStandardVersioningStrategy/issues/1#issuecomment-1878467923, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD3HUUGG7O7C5KS7GIF6LDDYM7KPXAVCNFSM6AAAAAAZO4PU4KVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNZYGQ3DOOJSGM . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: <ehealthplatformstandards/FHIRStandardVersioningStrategy/issues/1/1878467923 @github.com>