ehealthplatformstandards / FHIRStandardVersioningStrategy

How will we handle the ongoing evolution of the international FHIR standard in Belgium?
0 stars 0 forks source link

What are possible options to convert an entire ecosystem from R4 to R5? #2

Open bdc-ehealth opened 1 year ago

bdc-ehealth commented 1 year ago

Just brainstorming, regardless of feasibility...

bdc-ehealth commented 1 year ago

Dimensions of the above options:

bdc-ehealth commented 10 months ago

Some elements of a hybrid system are described in this document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UUxCpMmkyr3z4_Au7x3SslKfwcb1ILLr/edit

bdc-ehealth commented 10 months ago

This is a test to simply compile core with fhirVersion 5.0.0 : https://github.com/hl7-be/core/issues/64 and https://build.fhir.org/ig/hl7-be/core/branches/issue-64/

bdc-ehealth commented 9 months ago

For some strange reason, the google doc above is not editable anymore. I replaced the document by this one: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v8U3GK-AWbVpFQg2XZ4uHPn5vWbAdJ_cyk1vE-SSiqM/edit because of new information.