Find Document Lists [ITI-66] (Oliver Egger, ahdis ag)

[ig-feedback]

ch.fhir.ig.ch-epr-fhir#4.0.0-ci-build /iti-66.html

Can we remove this transaction? I don't see a use case for it in the Swiss Context (this corresponds to the SubmissionSet).

Oliver Egger, ahdis ag

[oliveregger]

Telco vom 8.5: remove transcation no use case

[staffoleo]

Hi Oliver, We're actually planning to implement this. We'll need it to query all the documentReferences related to the same SubmissionSet. The main use case will be to have in the same submissionSet a documentRefernece with the PDF and another documentReference with the fhir+json reperesentation. Would there be other ways to achive the same thing?

[oliveregger]

@staffoleo thanks for the usecase, i was not aware that the structured data and represented data are stored separately.

For the swiss exchange formats, the representation is either embedded (MedicationCard) or required to be done through a stylesheet (Vaccination). Do you have any other use cases?

Would there be other ways to achive the same thing?

I would set DocumentReference.relatesTo code to transforms and query the related documents with relationship parameter and the code to transforms. there is a small problem, because MHD does not include this parameter int the list.

however if that would be a solution I will propose a change to the MHD Find Document References Request Message

[oliveregger]

@staffoleo any update on this if you still need [ITI-66]?

[staffoleo]

It's perfectly fine to us to use the "relatesTo" code. No objection in removing the transaction.

[oliveregger]

telco from 4.7: remove the transcation from the guide and make a note in ch:mhd that the transcation does not need to be supported.