Currently, only “happy paths” are tested: CertLogic expressions that are valid, evaluate to a value, and don't throw an error. The validation (both format/syntax and runtime type checking) should be explicitly tested as well, to ensure that changes w.r.t. that aspect (such as issue #103) don't break anything.
Currently, only “happy paths” are tested: CertLogic expressions that are valid, evaluate to a value, and don't throw an error. The validation (both format/syntax and runtime type checking) should be explicitly tested as well, to ensure that changes w.r.t. that aspect (such as issue #103) don't break anything.