Closed chris2286266 closed 3 years ago
Is fine - but we need an expert like @gcangiolo to make sure it is absolutely right about https://github.com/ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema.
Dw
tst
and rec
to make them similar to `vacthen we're done I think. Also, test the schema with some other tool - both the 2020-12 and draft7 versions.
Hi Dirk,
just to better understand, since this schema is not FHIR, which kind of support do you expect on my side ?
Providing a mapping from the FHIR resources to the schema ? Make some other kind of cross-check ?
Thanks, Giorgio
-----Messaggio originale----- Da: Dirk-Willem van Gulik @.> Inviato: mercoledì 14 aprile 2021 13:24 A: ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema @.> Cc: ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema @.>; Mention @.>; Giorgio Cangioli @.***> Oggetto: Re: [ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema] Bring it to 1.0 ... (#15)
Is fine - but we need an expert like @gcangiolo to make sure it is absolutely right about https://github.com/ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema.
Dw
I guess we now have to finalise it as version 1.0. Who can make an assessment on the conformance between the schema and what has been drafted by the semantic group?
ping @dirkx @gabywh @martin-lindstrom @jschlyter
Hi all, I updated it with the topics discussed today: https://github.com/ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema/blob/cert-meta/eu_dgc_v1_schema.yaml I also aligned it with the latest document of the semantics colleagues (from 2021-04-14) some days ago.
So please someone check it, that we can finalise it asap.
THX
All merged now by request from @martin-lindstrom, we'll handle any fallout in main.
The "official" one is on ms-teams, I'm working on that, also spoke to Hynek earlier this morning re semantic-sg and what has been decided there
I'm trying to pull all strands together inclusive of proposed EU legislation, without re-inventing any wheels.
I'm aiming to have to have a version ready tomorrow a.m. on ms-teams, will let you know
Gaby
Op 19-04-2021 om 12:31 schreef Fredrik Ljunggren:
I guess we now have to finalise it as version 1.0. Who can make an assessment on the conformance between the schema and what has been drafted by the semantic group?
ping @dirkx https://github.com/dirkx @gabywh https://github.com/gabywh @martin-lindstrom https://github.com/martin-lindstrom @jschlyter https://github.com/jschlyter
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema/issues/15#issuecomment-822363615, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ASHCPHO62ILZNK2F4K44YZ3TJQBB3ANCNFSM425FLWUQ.
+1 🙏
Hi Dirk, just to better understand, since this schema is not FHIR, which kind of support do you expect on my side ? Providing a mapping from the FHIR resources to the schema ? Make some other kind of cross-check ? Thanks, Giorgio … -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Dirk-Willem van Gulik @.> Inviato: mercoledì 14 aprile 2021 13:24 A: ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema @.> Cc: ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema @.>; Mention @.>; Giorgio Cangioli @.***> Oggetto: Re: [ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema] Bring it to 1.0 ... (#15) Is fine - but we need an expert like @gcangiolo to make sure it is absolutely right about https://github.com/ehn-digital-green-development/hcert-schema. Dw
====
@gcangiolo: this schema is indeed completely separate to FHIR and the two are only related in so far as we have the practical question: once we have this schema defined, how do get the data from e.g. an IIS supporting FHIR? I'll catch up with Christof and yourself on this one (the Word doc thing...). Gaby.
as everything seems clear, i'll close it now ...
Should we bring the schema now to Version 1.0 and tell Martin Mitev about?
Who should do this? I's suggest @dirkx
Regards, Chris