As you know, expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let anyone better/faster understand how to reuse/adapt/modify your sources (and not only) in other open projects and vice-versa.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, license file omission obviously causes an inconsistent generation of the relative badge too:
Anyway you can easily set a standardized one through the GH's license wizard tool.
Last but not least, let us know how - in your opinion - we could improve our categorizations and links to resources in order to favor collaboration between developers (and therefore evolution) of listed projects.
Hi there, 1st of all thanks for your cool work !
Since we've "doxed" it in our HyMPS project (under the VIDEO \ Tools \ GUIs subsection), can you please add the license to it ?
As you know, expliciting licensing terms is extremely important to let anyone better/faster understand how to reuse/adapt/modify your sources (and not only) in other open projects and vice-versa.
Although it may sounds like a minor aspect, license file omission obviously causes an inconsistent generation of the relative badge too:
Anyway you can easily set a standardized one through the GH's license wizard tool.
Last but not least, let us know how - in your opinion - we could improve our categorizations and links to resources in order to favor collaboration between developers (and therefore evolution) of listed projects.
Thanks in advance.