Open chchatte92 opened 1 year ago
@c-dilks if you notice the entries for merged cases that is exactly the sum of Gas and Aerogel entries. The problem is, to understand how much is the noise under the aerogel peak?
The yellow filled distribution is SPE angular distribution w/o injected noise. Definitely, with added noise the distribution has got fattened. But, what bothers me, the shape. Will the estimation of the background under the peak be an underestimation?
For the gas situation is like this: This is a shape I would have expected also for the aerogel
- Reconstruct the dRICH simulation with config/recon_irt_noise.yaml that can be found in drich-dev
Or run with -PDRICH:DRICHRawHits:enableNoise=true
for those who don't use the drich-dev
parameter config files.
The default values are set here: https://github.com/eic/EICrecon/blob/a8cd3a9617d0b3e09c01427b4a889f4787e02599/src/detectors/DRICH/DRICH.cc#L42-L44
https://github.com/eic/EICrecon/issues/1026#issuecomment-1737644238 Thanks @c-dilks , I forgot to mention that option.
@c-dilks our student Tiziano made a quite a bit of progress on this issue.
Environment: (where does this bug occur, have you tried other environments)
main
for latest released): MainHEAD
for the most recent on git): N/ASteps to reproduce: (give a step by step account of how to trigger the bug)
Expected Result: (what do you expect when you execute the steps above)
The expectation is the uniform noise will go linearly over larger surface. This indicates the amount of noise we will observe for aerogel will be larger than the gaseous rings over the entire azimuthal distribution of SPE Cherenkov angle distribution.
Actual Result: (what do you get when you execute the steps above)